may sound like a tongue twister title of this article we want to share with you, but we can go together like unlocking all the leagues and minds.
Suppose someone (X) hold an idea, and declare true, absolutely true ... maybe not tildarÃamos of "front", "gorilla", "backward", etc..? But, according to the assumptions, which would if another person (Y) holds another idea, which is absolute the pluralism, ie something like this ... "or accept all thoughts as equal, or you are a" front "and a" gorilla. "
take an example, three friends are looking at a wall and you say, is white, another said: - It is not cream. And a third says: It is not oil. Then comes a fourth friend and says, - the wall is not of any color, let us agree at 4, invent a new name so the call.
We wonder: is the fourth friend is not able to stay for 3 people that are different from him and wants to bring all your thinking? Would not it be more sensible to accept the wall is dark and perish in pursuit of truth, accepting the differing opinion of others without sales? Or is it perhaps that those who give it as pluralist are only mediocre people, who do not accept others and we want to bullying in a new totalitarianism, relativism?
Dear friends we leave these questions, we want answers, we just want help thinking ... Because behind this way of seeing things, lies a major contradiction ... put examples:
1. "The truth is not universal (" Except that right?)
Suppose someone (X) hold an idea, and declare true, absolutely true ... maybe not tildarÃamos of "front", "gorilla", "backward", etc..? But, according to the assumptions, which would if another person (Y) holds another idea, which is absolute the pluralism, ie something like this ... "or accept all thoughts as equal, or you are a" front "and a" gorilla. "
take an example, three friends are looking at a wall and you say, is white, another said: - It is not cream. And a third says: It is not oil. Then comes a fourth friend and says, - the wall is not of any color, let us agree at 4, invent a new name so the call.
We wonder: is the fourth friend is not able to stay for 3 people that are different from him and wants to bring all your thinking? Would not it be more sensible to accept the wall is dark and perish in pursuit of truth, accepting the differing opinion of others without sales? Or is it perhaps that those who give it as pluralist are only mediocre people, who do not accept others and we want to bullying in a new totalitarianism, relativism?
Dear friends we leave these questions, we want answers, we just want help thinking ... Because behind this way of seeing things, lies a major contradiction ... put examples:
1. "The truth is not universal (" Except that right?)
2. "No one can know the truth (" Except you know the supposed truth that you just to affirm?)
3. "The truth is uncertain (Is that right?)
4. "All generalizations are false (Is this too?)
5. - Do not be dogmatic, facho! (And that statement is not?)
6. - Do not impose your truth! (And you're not now impose yours?)
7. - There are no absolutes! ("Dead?) 8. "The truth is only your opinion (say, of course)
convince Let us not disguise ideas of pluralism and tolerance, we are not slaves to mediocrity, but the truth will set us free ...
convince Let us not disguise ideas of pluralism and tolerance, we are not slaves to mediocrity, but the truth will set us free ...
