okay if I found him! Or directly "I'm not I'll take idiot" . But there is no action that would betray the poor moral hypocrisy that lurks. Most people respond that stealing is wrong, but in these situations, blind their conscience (to avoid the charge of them) convince themselves that they are not stealing. However, theft is appropriating something that is not for us, who did not win, it's not ours, and for more than the conventional way of "stealing", we are taking over something that was from someone else and has the right to keep having. 
. 
there is selfishness and individualism, as a result of the hunger for profit and convenience. We forget that there is "another person" is wrong, anxious, sad because you lost something valuable and potentially serious of a great joy to recover things. Why is always the ego above everything and everyone, trying to capitalize on every situation? ... If you had a wallet and it falls on the road and is a person behind ... Is not it okay to return it because it was yours? ... But when it is convenient to us is well stay ...
2 Example: The sexist double standard, fully rough and inconsistent. The man who walks with a lot of girls is considered the winner, a teacher, an idol ... even the girls themselves regard it as "The Boy", gets popular, is flattered and admired by his comrades and friends. However, when the girls walk with many children, are considered as "light." The man condemns the attitudes of women ... and not enforcing his life because he favors having that reputation. And who is to blame for huge hypocrisy?, "Only men? No, it is society which we all belong, and which no one takes responsibility. The funny thing is that the feminism that often comes in response to this criticism and protest wanting to unleash women to be "liberal" when in reality it is women that if they should "walk with many children, but they who should NOT have to use women as mere objects to satiate their appetites. (I recommend the article sexual Moral
). Something nasty that is related to the moral hypocrisy is the lack of conscience in exercising men who keep girls on the street, commonly called prostitutes. How a man can criticize women for being ligerita when he is promoting prostitution? The main way to ensure that no prostitution, is that there are "consumers." Does do not realize that there is a human being, a person, a story behind the lives of these girls (or boys)? And again it is argued, "they want" they sought them, "as if they were valid reasons ... just part of that band to be put not to feel guilty about all the evil done, and it hurts when others What is remarkable. 80% of girls are born in places prostitutes marginalized, excluded any possibility of development, no education, can not read or write, silver is largely in the brothel that end up enslaved ... they end up living, as his home, in a brothel."But you will be okay with your sister or your mother were prostitutes? ... you realize ... all part of the moral hypocrisy. It's okay when it suits us and is wrong when it suits us. 3 Example: This example is somewhat controversial, but essentially the same. This is the reality of abortion. But there's all discussion and debate of being for or against, the reality is that since the science of life begins from the moment of conception, relativize avoid saying "I find that no", "I find that if "etc. Clearly baseless. Life begins at conception, because scientifically from the same time the cell has 46 chromosomes that are the same as you and I have at this point in every cell of our bodies, 23 from the father and 23 mothers. Terminate the pregnancy, is not to stop the development of a person, that would be the same moral sense to kill a boy of 2 years because development has not yet, no opportunity to decide rationally and the mother does not want to have it because a lot of work, spend lots of money and has other plans.
4 examples: it is at school, to deliver the exams, students look at their assessment, to see if the teacher is wrong about something correct. Curiously, when the teacher make a mistake while editing, and more low points than any, immediately protested and replicate because it is unjust note ... Is this wrong? Not for nothing ... if the teacher is wrong to correct this right to amend the error. However, when the teacher is wrong to correct but instead of getting off our score up, fence may not ever tell the teacher to correct that mistake and should get off the note. Do you seem silly to go talk to the teacher to drop you note that you deserve? Is not it more mediocre that morals change to suit the individual? On the other hand, suppose that we are going to buy some vegetables on the run and the greengrocer is wrong to give us back and give us less, then claim but when do we give more? ... According to us a relationship with the dealer ... if not very good, surely the money is not returned to its owner.
In many cases people do not act as in the examples but many others do. By contrast the young idealist should maintain a level of principles and values, to enable it to clear what is right and what is wrong. This does not mean that mistakes, all we make, of course I, and possibly more than many others. But the fact is do not call good what is bad. The goal is to pursue the good even though it costs or be unable to reach well for our human frailties. From my experience the best you can do is recognize the evil that is committed and able to say with consciousness: "This is wrong ..." So, repent and look to the meaning of our life, try to grow and improve as people, to experience the joy of having peace in our hearts.
"The man used the hypocrisy to deceive himself, perhaps more than to deceive others."
Jaime Balmes
"Hypocrisy is the height of all evils. " Molière
0 comments:
Post a Comment